The decision by Iraq to lower the legal age of marriage for girls to 9 has sparked outrage and condemnation from human rights organizations, activists, and the international community. This move is seen as a significant step backward in the fight for gender equality, the protection of children’s rights, and the fight against pedophilia. The new law not only endangers the physical and mental well-being of young girls but also perpetuates cycles of pedophilia, sexual abuse, violence, poverty, and inequality.
The Insanity of Lowering the Marriage Age to 9
- Health Risks:
- Physical Health: Girls who marry at such a young age are at a higher risk of complications during pregnancy and childbirth. Their bodies are not fully developed, making them more susceptible to life-threatening conditions such as obstetric fistula and maternal mortality.
- Mental Health: Early marriage often leads to psychological trauma, including depression and anxiety. These young girls are thrust into adult responsibilities without the emotional maturity to handle them.
- Education:
- Dropout Rates: Married girls are often forced to leave school, depriving them of education and future opportunities. This perpetuates the cycle of poverty and limits their ability to contribute to their communities.
- Economic Dependence: Without education, these girls are more likely to remain economically dependent on their husbands, making it difficult for them to escape abusive relationships.
- Human Rights Violations:
- Childhood Robbery: Marriage at such a young age robs girls of their childhood, forcing them into roles they are not prepared for.
- Violence and Abuse: Child brides are more likely to experience domestic violence and sexual abuse. They have little to no legal recourse in such situations.
Historical Context: Mohammed’s Marriage to Aisha
The decision to lower the marriage age in Iraq has drawn comparisons to the historical marriage of the Islamic prophet Mohammed to Aisha, who, according to Islamic tradition, was married at the age of 6 and the marriage was consummated when she was around 9. This historical event is often cited in discussions about child marriage in Islamic societies and pedophilia.
- Historical vs. Modern Context:
- Cultural Norms: In 7th-century Arabia, the cultural and social norms were vastly different from today. Practices that were acceptable then are now considered violations of human rights.
- Modern Standards: Today, we have a much better understanding of child development and the long-term impacts of early marriage. International human rights standards clearly state that marriage should be entered into only with the full and free consent of both parties, who should be of a mature age.
- Religious Interpretation:
- Selective Application: Some argue that using Mohammed’s marriage to Aisha as a justification for child marriage is a selective interpretation of religious texts. Many Islamic scholars and activists emphasize that the primary teachings of Islam promote justice, equality, and the well-being of individuals.
- Reformist Views: There is a growing movement within Islamic communities to reinterpret religious texts in a way that aligns with modern human rights standards. These reformists argue that the context of Mohammed’s marriage to Aisha should not be used to justify harmful practices today.
Conclusion
Lowering the legal age of marriage for girls to 9 is a regressive and harmful policy that endangers the lives and futures of countless young girls. It is crucial for the international community, human rights organizations, and local activists to continue advocating for the rights of children and to push for the repeal of such laws. Historical practices, including those of religious figures, should not be used to justify violations of human rights in the modern era. Instead, we must strive to create a world where every child, regardless of gender, can grow up in safety, receive an education, and have the opportunity to reach their full potential.
Featured image credit: DepositPhotos.com
