The announcement from Nexstar Media Group on September 17, 2025, marks a bold stand against inflammatory rhetoric in mainstream media. Nexstar, the largest owner of local television stations in the United States, has decided to drop “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” from its ABC-affiliated stations for the foreseeable future. This move follows Kimmel’s recent monologue, where he made remarks perceived as celebratory or dismissive of the tragic assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025. The decision underscores growing concerns about media responsibility, the limits of free speech, and the power of local broadcasters to shape national discourse.

Charlie Kirk’s death at Utah Valley University sent shockwaves across the country, prompting widespread mourning and calls for justice. As a founder of Turning Point USA, Kirk championed principles of individual liberty, limited government, and personal responsibility, inspiring millions to engage in civic life. His loss highlighted the dangers of political violence, and any perceived minimization of this tragedy has drawn sharp criticism. Nexstar’s action represents a pushback against what many view as biased entertainment programming that crosses into hate speech, reinforcing the need for accountability in an era of polarized media.
This development not only affects Kimmel’s show but also raises questions about the role of late-night television in influencing public opinion. With Nexstar owning over 200 stations, the decision impacts a significant portion of ABC’s audience, potentially reshaping viewing habits and advertiser relationships. It serves as a reminder that local markets prioritize community values over national celebrity, aligning with conservative ideals of grassroots control and moral standards.
The Controversial Comments & Immediate Backlash
Jimmy Kimmel’s monologue on September 16, 2025, aired on ABC, included segments where he referenced Kirk’s assassination in a manner that many interpreted as mocking or insensitive. Kimmel quipped about the event in the context of political satire, drawing parallels to ongoing debates on conservatism. Critics, including conservative commentators and Kirk’s supporters, condemned the remarks as “vile” and exploitative, arguing they trivialized a heinous act of violence. Social media erupted with hashtags like #CancelKimmel and #JusticeForKirk, amassing millions of views and calls for boycotts.
The backlash intensified when clips spread rapidly on platforms like X, where users highlighted Kimmel’s history of partisan commentary. Turning Point USA issued a statement denouncing the show as “a platform for hate,” urging affiliates to reconsider affiliations. Advertisers, sensitive to public sentiment, began pulling support, with reports of major brands distancing themselves from ABC late-night programming. This swift reaction demonstrates the power of public outrage in holding media accountable, a principle rooted in free market dynamics where consumer choice drives content decisions.
Nexstar’s response came swiftly, with a spokesperson stating the decision was made to align with community standards and avoid content that promotes division. This move echoes broader trends where local stations exercise independence from network mandates, prioritizing viewer trust over corporate directives. In a nation valuing constitutional freedoms, such actions affirm that speech, while protected, carries consequences when it veers into irresponsibility.
Nexstar’s Role & the Decision-Making Process
Nexstar Media Group, headquartered in Irving, Texas, operates a vast network of local stations, including many ABC affiliates. The company has long emphasized community-focused programming, often adapting national content to regional tastes. Dropping “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” affects dozens of markets, from major cities like New York to smaller communities in the Midwest. Executives cited viewer feedback and internal reviews as key factors, noting that the show’s tone no longer resonated with audiences seeking balanced entertainment.
The decision process involved consultations with station managers and legal teams, ensuring compliance with FCC regulations on indecency and bias. Nexstar’s CEO emphasized in a memo that the company remains committed to diverse viewpoints but draws the line at content that endangers social cohesion. This stance reflects a conservative approach to media stewardship, where limited government intervention is complemented by private sector self-regulation. By acting decisively, Nexstar positions itself as a defender of traditional values, potentially gaining loyalty from viewers disillusioned with Hollywood elites.
Financial implications are significant, as late-night shows drive ad revenue through syndication. However, Nexstar anticipates filling the slot with alternative programming, such as local news extensions or family-friendly specials, which could boost ratings in conservative-leaning areas. This shift highlights the evolving media landscape, where local control empowers communities to reject divisive narratives.
Implications for Late-Night Television & Free Speech
The dropping of Kimmel’s show signals a potential sea change for late-night television, long dominated by liberal-leaning hosts. Programs like “The Tonight Show” and “Late Night with Seth Meyers” may face similar scrutiny if they engage in controversial commentary. Networks like ABC, owned by Disney, must now navigate advertiser pressures and affiliate demands, possibly leading to more neutral content. This development promotes a marketplace of ideas where audiences vote with their remotes, aligning with principles of free enterprise.
From a free speech perspective, the action raises debates about censorship versus accountability. Conservatives argue that while the First Amendment protects expression, private entities like broadcasters have the right to curate content. Kimmel’s defenders claim it stifles satire, but supporters of the decision counter that true free speech thrives in environments free from hate. The case exemplifies how individual liberty includes the freedom to choose what one consumes, without government overreach.
Broader media trends show increasing fragmentation, with streaming services and podcasts offering alternatives to traditional TV. Nexstar’s move could accelerate this shift, encouraging creators to produce content that respects diverse viewpoints. In an age of instant feedback, accountability ensures media serves the public good, fostering informed discourse essential to democracy.
Public & Political Reactions
Public reaction has been polarized, with conservative outlets praising Nexstar as a champion against “woke Hollywood.” Figures like Senator Ted Cruz lauded the decision on social media, stating it restores sanity to broadcasting. Liberal commentators, however, decried it as corporate censorship, fearing it chills political humor. Polls indicate majority support among independents for holding media accountable, reflecting a desire for balanced reporting.
Politically, the event has fueled discussions on media reform. Bipartisan calls for transparency in affiliate agreements highlight the need for stations to reflect community values. Advertisers, wary of backlash, are reevaluating partnerships, potentially leading to more advertiser-friendly programming. This dynamic empowers consumers, embodying conservative tenets of personal responsibility in media consumption.
Community leaders in affected markets express relief, noting that families prefer uplifting content over divisive monologues. This grassroots response reinforces the importance of local decision-making, where government steps back to allow free markets to self-correct.
Broader Media Landscape & Future Outlook
Nexstar’s action occurs amid a turbulent media environment, with declining viewership for late-night shows and rising popularity of conservative-leaning outlets. The Kirk assassination amplified sensitivities around political violence, making insensitive comments particularly toxic. As affiliates explore replacements, opportunities arise for innovative programming that promotes unity and traditional values.
Looking ahead, this could prompt ABC to rethink Kimmel’s format or negotiate with affiliates. For Nexstar, it strengthens its brand as a defender of community standards, potentially attracting new talent. The incident serves as a cautionary tale for media figures, reminding them that words have consequences in a vigilant society.
Ultimately, Nexstar’s decision upholds the principle that media must serve the people, not agendas. By rejecting content that mocks tragedy, it contributes to a healthier public square, where free speech flourishes through mutual respect and accountability.
Featured image credit: DepositPhotos.com