DeepSeek: A Chinese Communist Party Tool For Information Control

Published on January 28, 2025, 6:12 am
FavoriteLoadingAdd to favorites 5 mins

DeepSeek, marketed as an advanced AI search tool, has been generating buzz as a supposed beacon of innovation in providing accurate and transparent information. However, as many users have discovered, it appears to be more of a propaganda machine than a reliable source of truth. Beneath its sleek interface lies a disturbing bias that raises serious concerns about its credibility, objectivity, and ultimate purpose.

Recently, one user tested DeepSeek’s claims of impartiality by querying sensitive topics such as the occupation of Tibet, the Tiananmen Square massacre, and Taiwan’s sovereignty. What followed was an alarming display of blatant bias. DeepSeek began spouting carefully curated Chinese Communist Party (CCP) propaganda, whitewashing historical atrocities, and repeating state-approved narratives. This was not a glitch. It was a clear indication that DeepSeek is programmed to align with the CCP’s ideological stance, prioritizing propaganda over factual accuracy.

Even more concerning, after repeated questions on these topics, the user was abruptly locked out. A message popped up reading, “You are sending messages too frequently. Please wait a moment before sending again.” This convenient throttling of access to questions critical of the CCP reeks of censorship. It demonstrates how DeepSeek does not merely disseminate biased information but actively stifles dissent and discourages users from questioning its narrative.

A Pattern of Suppression

The bias exhibited by DeepSeek is no coincidence. It reflects a troubling pattern of suppression and control over information that aligns with the Chinese government’s broader strategy of leveraging technology to reshape global perceptions. By blocking questions about Tibet, Tiananmen Square, and Taiwan—topics that are well-documented areas of Chinese state censorship—DeepSeek reveals itself as a tool for advancing the CCP’s agenda.

Tibet remains an occupied region, its culture and autonomy systematically eroded by decades of Chinese policies. The Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989 resulted in the deaths of hundreds, if not thousands, of peaceful protesters—an event that remains heavily censored in China. Taiwan, a self-governing democracy, is falsely claimed by Beijing as part of its territory. Yet, instead of presenting these facts, DeepSeek parrots Beijing’s revisionist narratives, undermining its claim of being an unbiased source of information.

Why This Matters

Artificial intelligence systems like DeepSeek are increasingly influencing how people access and understand information. This makes it essential for such tools to prioritize objectivity and truth. When a platform openly displays ideological bias and suppresses critical topics, it becomes a dangerous instrument of misinformation. Users who rely on DeepSeek for research, education, or decision-making are being fed propaganda rather than facts.

DeepSeek’s willingness to act as an apologist for authoritarianism undermines the principles of free inquiry and intellectual honesty. Moreover, its ability to shut down uncomfortable lines of questioning signals that it is not interested in fostering a culture of transparency but rather one of compliance.

Do Not Trust DeepSeek

It is clear that DeepSeek cannot be trusted. Users should be wary of platforms that claim to provide “unbiased” information while aligning themselves with authoritarian ideologies. DeepSeek’s behavior demonstrates that it serves as a tool for advancing the interests of the CCP, rather than empowering users with truthful and diverse perspectives.

What Can Be Done?

  1. Hold Developers Accountable: Developers of platforms like DeepSeek must be transparent about how their tools are programmed, particularly regarding politically sensitive topics. Bias in AI programming must be exposed and addressed.
  2. Demand Ethical Standards: AI systems must adhere to strict ethical standards that prioritize neutrality, transparency, and freedom of information over appeasing oppressive regimes.
  3. Choose Reliable Alternatives: Users should explore alternative tools that prioritize truth and objectivity. Fact-checking independent sources and relying on diverse perspectives are critical in combating the spread of misinformation.
  4. Raise Awareness: It is crucial to shine a light on incidents like this to prevent platforms like DeepSeek from gaining undue influence. Share experiences, demand answers, and advocate for reforms.

In an era where truth is under attack, the responsibility to safeguard it cannot be ignored. DeepSeek’s bias is a wake-up call for all who value freedom of information. Trust must be earned, and DeepSeek has failed miserably in proving itself worthy of it. Instead of being a tool for truth-seeking, it has revealed itself as an accomplice to disinformation, deserving nothing but skepticism and scrutiny.

 

Featured image credit: DepositPhotos.com

Jonas Bronck is the pseudonym under which we publish and manage the content and operations of The Bronx Daily.™ | Bronx.com - the largest daily news publication in the borough of "the" Bronx with over 1.5 million annual readers. Publishing under the alias Jonas Bronck is our humble way of paying tribute to the person, whose name lives on in the name of our beloved borough.