You know, there is something about award shows these days that just feels off. What used to be a night of celebrating talent and hard work has turned into a soapbox for political rants. And at the 77th Primetime Emmy Awards on September 14, 2025, Hannah Einbinder, the “star” from “Hacks,” proved that point all too well. She did not just accept her first Emmy with grace—she ended her speech with a bombshell: “Go Birds, fuck ICE, and free Palestine.”
Sure, the censors bleeped out the profanity on live TV, but the internet does not forget. Within minutes, the uncensored version was everywhere, lighting up social media and news feeds. From a conservative perspective, this was not just a slip-up; it was a deliberate attack on American values, law enforcement, and our allies abroad. Let us dive into why this moment matters and why it is drawing so much fire from folks who prioritize security, patriotism, and common sense over celebrity virtue-signaling.
The Speech That Shocked the Nation
Picture this: The Emmy stage, bright lights, a packed audience of Hollywood elites clapping away. Einbinder, fresh off her win for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series, starts off innocently enough, thanking her co-stars and family. But then she drops the hammer. “Go Birds” is harmless—it is just a shoutout to her beloved Philadelphia Eagles, something any football fan can get behind. But the rest? “Fuck ICE” is a direct slam against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the folks on the front lines protecting our borders from illegal crossings, drug traffickers, and worse. And “free Palestine”? That is code for siding with terrorist Muslim groups that have long opposed Israel, America’s steadfast ally in the Middle East, often ignoring the complexities of terrorism and self-defense.
Einbinder later tried to explain herself, saying she wanted to “stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people” and separate Jewish identity from Israel’s policies. As a Republican, I get the idea of free speech, but come on—using an Emmy win to push this agenda? It is not brave; it is reckless. These are not just words; they are fuel for division at a time when our country needs unity. Think about the families of ICE agents risking their lives daily, or the Israeli citizens dealing with constant threats. Her speech did t acknowledge any of that. Instead, it played right into the hands of far-left activists who love to bash America first. And let us be real, if a conservative actor pulled something similar—say, praising border walls or supporting Israel unequivocally—the media would crucify them. But Einbinder? She gets a pass from the liberal press, which only highlights the double standard in Tinseltown.
Why Her Comments Are Problematic From a Conservative View
Let’s break this down without the Hollywood gloss. First off, that anti-ICE jab. ICE isn not some boogeyman; it is a vital agency under the Department of Homeland Security, enforcing laws passed by Congress to keep our borders secure. Republicans have long championed strong immigration policies because uncontrolled borders lead to chaos—higher crime rates, strained resources, and threats to national security. Einbinder’s “fuck ICE” is not just rude; it is dangerous. It encourages disrespect toward law enforcement, and we have seen the results: increased assaults on ICE officers, as the DHS itself pointed out in their condemnation. In a post-9/11 world, undermining these protectors is progressive—it is naive and anti-American.
Then there is “free Palestine.” From a conservative standpoint, this phrase often glosses over the real issues in the region. Israel is a democracy fighting for its existence against terrorist groups like Hamas, who use civilians as shields and launch rockets indiscriminately. Republicans stand with Israel because shared values matter—freedom, innovation, and defense against radicalism. Einbinder’s call ignores the hostages still held in Gaza, the October 7 atrocities, and the need for genuine peace negotiations. It is easy to chant slogans from a glamorous stage, but it does not help the situation on the ground. Worse, it can stoke antisemitism here at home, something no true patriot wants. As conservatives, we believe in supporting allies who share our fight against extremism, not throwing them under the bus for applause from the woke crowd.
Her involvement in Artists4Ceasefire? Sure, calling for an end to violence sounds noble, but these groups often one-side the story, demanding concessions from Israel while ignoring Palestinian leadership’s role in perpetuating conflict. It is the kind of activism that feels good but achieves little, and it certainly does not belong in an acceptance speech meant to honor entertainment, not divide the audience.
Backlash from Patriotic Americans
The fallout was swift and justified. Conservative leaders did not hold back, and why should they? Senator Ted Cruz, a staunch defender of border security and Israel, called her out directly, accusing her of “promoting hatred and undermining national security.” He was spot on—words like hers embolden those who want open borders and weaken our alliances. Other Republican voices echoed this, from talk radio hosts to everyday folks on social media. One X post (formerly Twitter) from a conservative commentator summed it up: “Hollywood stars live in gated mansions but hate the walls that protect our country. Hypocrisy at its finest.”
Even the government weighed in. The DHS statement highlighted the real-world dangers: assaults on ICE agents are up, and rhetoric like Einbinder’s only makes their jobs harder. As Republicans, we respect our first responders—police, border patrol, military—and we will not stand for celebrities trashing them. This is not about silencing dissent; it is about responsibility. If you are going to use your platform, at least get your facts straight and consider the consequences. The backlash is not just noise; it is a reminder that most Americans value law and order over celebrity tantrums.
Support from the Left: Misguided Solidarity
Of course, not everyone saw it that way. Progressive circles and fellow entertainers rushed to her defense, praising her “courage” for speaking out against “systemic injustices.” Groups like Artists4Ceasefire amplified her message, framing it as a bold stand for human rights. But from a Republican lens, this support is just more evidence of Hollywood’s leftist echo chamber. These are the same folks who push defund-the-police narratives while hiring private security. Their “solidarity” with Palestine often ignores the full picture, like Iran’s funding of terror or the rejection of peace deals by Palestinian leaders.
It is frustrating because it widens the cultural divide. Instead of uniting over great TV like “Hacks,” we are arguing politics. Einbinder’s fans might cheer, but they’re missing how this alienates half the country. Conservatives believe in debate, but not when it is one-sided and profane on prime time. This kind of support only reinforces why so many Americans tune out Hollywood—it is out of touch with heartland values.
Criticism from Within the Jewish Community: A Voice of Reason
Perhaps the most telling pushback came from fellow Jews who saw through the performative activism. Einbinder, who is Jewish herself, claimed she was dissociating Jewish identity from Israel’s actions, but critics argued she was doing the opposite—putting Jews at risk by fueling anti-Israel sentiment that often spills into antisemitism. Jewish actor Yuval David nailed it when he called her speech a “performance of ignorance, not courage.” He pointed out her failure to mention peace efforts or the hostages suffering in Gaza, which shows a lack of balance.
Other community members echoed this, warning that oversimplifying the Israeli-Palestinian conflict does not help anyone. As conservatives, many of us align with pro-Israel stances because history matters—the Holocaust’s lessons, the need for a Jewish homeland. Einbinder’s remarks ignore that, turning a personal win into a divisive stunt. It is heartening to see Jewish voices speaking up, reminding us that not all in the community buy into the far-left narrative.
The Bigger Picture: Celebrities and Politics in America
At the end of the day, Einbinder’s speech is a symptom of a larger issue: the blurring of entertainment and activism. Republicans have long argued that celebrities should stick to their scripts—entertain us, do not lecture us. Award shows like the Emmys are funded by viewers from all walks of life, not just coastal elites. When stars like Einbinder hijack the mic for politics, it turns off millions who just want to escape the daily grind.
This incident sparks a needed conversation: What is the role of fame in discourse? From a conservative view, it is fine to have opinions, but use them wisely—through op-eds, donations, or voting, not by cursing out federal agencies on TV. It undermines the event’s purpose and divides fans. Plus, it highlights Hollywood’s bias; imagine the outrage if a conservative actor praised Trump or the NRA. We would never hear the end of it.
In a polarized America, we need bridges, not bombshells. Einbinder’s moment might fade, but the lesson lingers: Patriotism, security, and respect for complexity should trump celebrity ego. As Republicans, we will keep calling out this nonsense, hoping for a return to awards that celebrate achievement, not agendas.
Featured image credit: DepositPhotos.com
